America, freedom Bradley Manning!

America, freedom Bradley Manning!
The United States of America July 6, 2010, was charged with soldier Bradley Manning.
Bradley Manning, he's only 22 years old. He is an intelligence analyst. Taking part in hostilities, with the states, jointly fighting the United States Army in Baghdad.
He was charged in obvinenenie disclosure of this video which demonstrates www.collateralmurder.com killing U.S. troops. Civilian population of Iraq, as well as journalists Reuters.
All this happened after (after allegedly told a journalist with an infidel). Responsible for the Pentagon Papers, the deputy, the second person to Wikileaks by Daniel Ellsberg.
He called Bradley Manning HERO!
Currently, Bradley Manning jailed in Kuwait City, Iraq.
Produced for the U.S. actions during the bombing of civilians from a helicopter Apache. The crew of the helicopter and those who are behind the cover, made a military action against civilians and journalists. Those actions by the U.S. military, which are depicted in the video, so far, not attracted to any liability. A justified by the United States. How do the actions that accompany, military action. That is, generally regarded as legitimate. When destroying the enemy. For one is destroyed, and peaceful nor the innocent population. Women, children and journalists. During the time spent in Iraq. 139 journalists have been killed. Innocent people doing their job.
Everyone who supports Bradley Manning. And to help ordinary Bradley Manning, see his website www.bradleymanning.org bradleymanning.org

April 5, 2010 10:44 EST site WikiLeaks classified U.S. military released video. With the image of direct killing a dozen people in Iraqi suburb of New Baghdad. Including two members of Reuters.
Reuters tried to get video using. Freedom of Information Act.
But without success, since the attack. Video shot from a cannon Apache helicopter appeared, clearly shows the unprovoked killing of injured employees of Reuters and its rescuers. Two young children involved in the rescue were seriously injured.
The military does not show how the Reuters staff were killed, and stated that they did not know about the wounded children were.
Following requests from Reuters, the incident was investigated, and the American military concluded that the actions of the soldiers were made in accordance with the law of armed conflict and their own "Rules of Engagement."
Consequently, WikiLeaks has released classified "Rules of Engagement": the 2006, 2007 and 2008. Identifying these rules before, during and after the murder.
WikiLeaks released as the original 38 minutes of video. And an abridged version of the initial analysis. Subtitles have been added to both versions of the broadcasts.
WikiLeaks got this video, as well as documents from the military informants. WikiLeaks goes to great lengths to verify the accuracy of the information that it receives. Analyzes and verifies information about the incident from different sources of material presentation. Representatives of the site spoke to witnesses and journalists directly involved in the incident.
WikiLeaks strives to ensure that all leaks of information that it receives, receives the attention it deserves. In this particular case, some of those killed were journalists who are just doing their job: putting their lives at risk to tell about the war. Iraq is a very dangerous place for journalists: the 2003 - 2009, 139 journalists were killed while carrying out their work.
At Thursday, March 3, 2011. The military tribunal of the U.S. Army announced yesterday that it has filed 22 additional charges against Bradley Manning.
It in particular accused of issuing hundreds of thousands of documents (as it still provided the video). Which was published last year on Wikileaks. Most charges are additional to those that have already been brought Bradley Manning.
But the most serious accusation Bradley Manning. This is "aiding the enemy". Which is punishable by death under Article 104, according to the Uniform Code of Military Justice. " Article 104 - which, like all the provisions of UCMJ, applies only to military personnel. B 104, paragraph (b) - says that the person is guilty if it "gives the intelligence, or communicates with the transfer of sensitive data to other people. Or makes any contact with the enemy, directly or indirectly. And if the defendant is found guilty on those counts. The sentence he will be the death penalty. Provided other forms of punishment. As a solution to court-martial or military commission. Possible to send there.
The charges against Bradley Manning.
Have no exact proof of his guilt, and they are pretty vague and do not indicate specifically what Bradley Manning did? What provisions are to break it? No specific personality "enemy", which he had given intelligence.
In fact, except for the wording on the issue of classified information in wartime. At the tribunal, there is not any! Not, not!
Although military prosecutors said: "that they intend to seek life imprisonment. Their aim is not to the death penalty. "
That for this alleged crime, military tribunals continued by imprisonment for life.
Last night, 03.03.2011 year. Bradley Manning was exposed to bodily torture and humiliation. All clothes with him has been withdrawn. Rangers prison. He remained in his cell, naked, over the next seven hours. At 5:00 am, Brig sounded an alarm for the detainees. At this point, PFC Bradley Manning was forced to stand naked in front of his cell.
The Acting Chief Brig (DBS) arrived shortly after 5:00 am in jail. And he ordered him to sit on his bed. Ten minutes later, the guard went to his cell to bring back Bradley Manning of his clothes.
This was done to humiliate the dignity of man, a soldier. Front of others. Such treatment is inexcusable and not justified. This is an embarrassment to the entire military justice system SSCHA, and should not be allowed in the global system of military justice.
Prison guards said Bradley Manning, that the same thing happen to him again the next night.
All the detainees were abused, Brigham and forced to endure this type in their isolation from society, these humiliations.
Today, the Pentagon press secretary Geoff Morrell made a statement to the press in an attempt to discredit concerns about the conditions of PFC Manning, and the conditions of his detention.
Geoff Morrell says so, that means that he personally visited the Bradley PFC Manning.
What is the world's journalists, it is very doubtful. Asking him direct questions:
And would like to receive a response.
On two separate questions of journalists:
1.You themselves visited him [PFC Bradley Manning]?
2.You have seen him in person?
It raises doubts in the international community.
Was the general Geoff Morrell, the Quantico brig?
Although it may be that Mr. Geoff Morrell visited the brig, he was not "visited". Of the PFC Bradley Manning. In particular, he never spoke with PFC Bradley Manning. And did not have any interactions with the PFC Bradley Manning. It is also unclear, and the time whether he had seen all very personally, PFC Bradley Manning at the Brig?
Geoff Morrell, said that the PFC Bradley Manning entered is not in solitary confinement.
Geoff Morrell, said that the PFC Bradley Manning not solitiary conclusion. He said that Brig consists of 30 cells, chambers, forming, U-shaped corridor. He said he saw seven other prisoners in the corridor. That PFC Bradley Manning was "not in the penalty pit" and not "apart from the others." He also said that the PFC Bradley Manning was "allowed to talk with others in the corridor."
Although it is possible, however, that the PFC Bradley Manning technically not kept in solitary confinement. The total effect on the conditions of his detention is tantamount, the contents of his solitary confinement. There are no other persons detained there, on both sides of PFC Bradley Manning. His cell-camera has no windows or natural light.
If PFC Bradley Manning tries to talk with other prisoners, which are located at a distance of several cells from it. Guards, or prohibit him from talking, and require him to stop talking.
Every day he is in an empty room. This is actually a single cell. Luggage dangerous criminals. PFC Bradley Manning resides in his cell, without going for a walk.
Geoff Morrell, said that the PFC Bradley Manning does not receive medical treatment as other prisoners in the brig.
Geoff Morrell points out that, in principle, PFC Bradley Manning, it says because his detention is classified as security detainees Maximum. Geoff Morrell, said that "in fact the only difference between the PFC Bradley Manning, and any other detainees," outside the "cage". Bradley Manning can not eat out of his cell. He can not communicate with other prisoners. He can not watch TV like normal people. Geoff Morrell points out that he alone of all those detained in Quantico, detained a strict regime.
Geoff Morrell, unable to shed light on some other important differences. Between maximum and minimum levels of security detainee. And the average level of security. As a detainee by the level of maximum.
PFC Bradley Manning is required to remain in his cell 23 hours a day. Whenever he goes out of his cell, the entire object is locked. PFC Bradley Manning should be on the hands and feet, restraints, fetter his movement.
When he is outside his cell, he was escorted by at least two guards. When he moves. Mid-level security detainees are not subject to these additional restrictions.
Geoff Morrell also omits one very important fact.
That PFC Bradley Manning is the only detainee at Quantico. Kotoray, runs like a prisoner, under the maximum level. Inspection POI continues on the recommendation of experts in the field of mental health. Which show that the PFC Bradley Manning is not a person's risk to himself or to others.
The conditions imposed on PFC Bradley Manning supervised POI (which are already in 8 months) are overly harsh and are punitive.
Conditions of POI have been reported in detail in a previous statement. In short, under the supervision of POI, guards checked PFC Bradley Manning every five minutes.
Asking him if he is OK; PFC Bradley Manning is required to answer in a positive way.
At night, if the guards did not see PFC Bradley Manning clearly and
clear. If he is the head natyanet blanket, or it will curdle closer to the wall. The guards awakened him. In order to guarantee and ensure that it is in order.
He is not allowed even to have a pillow or sheets for writing. He can not have any personal belongings in the chamber. He only allowed one book or one magazine.
At any given time to read. Book or magazine, take it at the end of the day before he goes to sleep. When he goes to sleep, he should undress to their underwear and surrender clothing guards. In prison, there is no other detainee as he was in Quantico.
To held in custody as a maximum and POI hours. Thus, as stated - Geoff Morrell said that in fact there is no difference between the PFC Bradley Manning, and other detainees at Quantico. All reports of violations of its rules of content is inaccurate. Geoff Morrell, said: that the content of PFC Bradley Manning, held at the maximum level for its own good.
Geoff Morrell, said: that the PFC Bradley Manning passes under the current conditions of detention in connection with the "seriousness of the accusation against him." It is guarded because of national security, nor the possibility of causing potential harm to himself that he could do for himself, or will receive harm from others.
Geoff Morrell, said that conditions of detention made: for
it [PFC Bradley Manning] own safety.
Although serious crime is one of the factors to be considered, it may not be the sole basis for the conclusion of conditions. PFC Bradley Manning is presumed innocent of these crimes. In addition, although the risk of self-harm or harm to others can be considered in determining appropriate conditions of detention, Brig own mental health to challenge the validity of this problem. Since August 2010, they have consistently found that the PFC Bradley Manning has no risk of self-harm and recommended to look POI, be repealed.
Within eight months, PFC Bradley Manning did everything asked of him. His pattern of behavior is not considered custody classification Brig.
Even Geoff Morrell acknowledged: that the PFC Bradley Manning behaved exemplary in terms of its behavior in cells of the block. Other detainees are usually removed from the custody and the maximum POI. Resent such screening, and demonstrate by their behavior that conditions are too tightened. For help.
Deputy Minister of the fleet: "Instructions (SECNAVINST) 1649.9C» Maximum custody and POI.
Intended to be used sparingly, and for a limited period of time. Despite this the Navy Instruction, PFC content of Bradley Manning is still in extremely harsh conditions of detention.
Given his "exemplary" behavior and that it is not considered a risk, to bring harm to himself. This content him in jail, and his condition. Apparently based solely on the nature of the charges.
Of course this causes anger and resentment of the public around the world! The guy in 1922 contain. As the maximum criminal offender. He did not kill anyone. And the tribunal, there is no any actual evidence of his guilt.
That America should be judged. World court. As in 1946. Tried Nazi war criminals at Nuremberg.
Who gave them the right to invade Iraq? What they found there nuclear facilities and missile. Who gave them the right to execute Saddam Hussein?
They ignored the opinion of the world. UN resolutions.
They destroyed Iraq. Destroyed his government. And they find all over themselves to justify it.
And if someone starts to show the real essence of America's actions.
The fact that the killing of civilians. Hiding behind the excuse. What does this during the war.
For America, there is not a right. And she had no shame before the world for their actions. Only the right "World aggressors". And "Terrorista!
And against the backdrop of America itself, with all its military activities.
Activities Bradley Manning, and commercial organizations Wiki leaks.
Not a crime.
And no American should be prosecuted and not anyone else.
Freedom Bradley Manning!
And the freedom of online journalism!
© Copyright: Феникс55, 2011
Свидетельство о публикации №2110304115